5. Why is it that McKeithen gets anything she wants published in the Almanac?

McKeithen is certainly brazen about making unfounded accusations publicly, especially from her seat on the council bench.  Frequently, her accusations are reported in the local paper instantly, as if the story was written simultaneously with her attacks. Also, it seems that many of those who support McKeithen’s positions get published “viewpoints.  It seems that few of those who have opposing voices get published. Why is that?  Does McKeithen have some personal connection with the management of the Almanac?  She seems to wield the power to get published at will to her political advantage—is this why the playing field is so uneven in town and people are so afraid of her?  The risk that the paper will publish anything she comes up with?

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “5. Why is it that McKeithen gets anything she wants published in the Almanac?

  1. Send this story
    Print this story

    Atherton: John Johns loses round in legal fight

    by Andrea Gemmet

    The saga of Atherton’s ex-finance director added some new twists last week, as a judge told John Johns he had to decide between suing the town and avoiding incriminating himself in a criminal investigation.

    In addition, Councilwoman Kathy McKeithen, who had been Mr. Johns’ staunchest supporter on the council, repudiated a statement the former finance director made under oath.

    Mr. Johns was in court on Friday, Feb. 29, trying to block the town from questioning him as part of its defense against his lawsuit for wrongful termination.

    A Superior Court judge disagreed with Mr. Johns’ argument, clearing the way for Atherton attorneys to take his deposition.

    Mr. Johns was fired in October after being put on administrative leave for two months while a private attorney hired by the town conducted an investigation into complaints against him. The investigator’s report painted Mr. Johns as a bully who may have improperly done outside work while on the town’s time.

    Mr. Johns maintains that he was targeted for blowing the whistle on fiscal improprieties in Atherton’s building and other departments. He has called the report from the investigation flawed and inaccurate.

    The San Mateo County District Attorney’s Office is currently investigating whether Mr. Johns used town equipment or town time while doing outside consulting work, said Chief Deputy District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe.

    Mr. Johns argued that he didn’t know there was a criminal investigation going on, citing a November phone conversation with Councilwoman McKeithen. He said Ms. McKeithen told him the criminal complaint was going nowhere, according to a declaration filed with the court.

    Ms. McKeithen, however, filed her own declaration on Feb. 27, saying she didn’t tell Mr. Johns anything about a criminal complaint against him. “The statement Mr. Johns attributed to me under penalty of perjury in his declaration … is not accurate,” she said.

    Mr. Johns’ attorney, George Camerlengo, argued that his client’s Fifth Amendment right to avoid incriminating himself in the criminal investigation would make it impossible for Mr. Johns to be questioned as part of the civil lawsuit for wrongful termination. He asked for a 60-day delay so the criminal investigation could wrap up.

    Judge Marie Weiner displayed little patience for that argument during Friday’s brief hearing, saying that the case law concerns only defendants in civil cases who were also facing criminal charges. Since Mr. Johns is the plaintiff who brought the civil lawsuit, the situation is different, she said.

    “I’m not going against case law,” she told Mr. Camerlengo. “If you want to make a new law, go ahead.”

    In her decision, Judge Weiner said, “A plaintiff is entitled to stand on his or her Fifth Amendment rights or to proceed with the civil suit — but a choice must be made.”

    Sorry. This story has been locked and no comments can be posted.
    951 page views

    Why does the Almanac lock stories on McKeithen from comments and not on other council members?

  2. McKeithen’s neighbor is Brian Bothun who was a reporter for the Palo Alto Daily. in 1998 she decided to campaign for council and discredit Chapman, Dudley, and the Atherton staff. She would give information to Bothun, who had a history with the Atherton Police. Bothun would write the stories, which drove up readership in the Daily and earned him a promotion.

    The Almanac felt scoped and started running the stories McKiethen was giving them. Having McKeithen in office provides for interesting stories and higher ad rates.

    The Almanac was the only paper to endorse her four years ago. Perhaps it is party politics. The Almanac does not like Republicans and the other members of the Atherton Council claim to be Republicans.

    There may be a connection to her husband Smith McKeithen. Smith served as counsel on the Impeachent Inquiry Staff of the Committee on the Judiciary of the U.S. House of Representatives in 1974.

Can you help provide an answer?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s